Quote:
Originally Posted by BaylorCamaro
Numbers are from dyno graphs provided by the manufacturers. The numbers were eyeballed and by no means 100% accurate. Measurements were taken every 500 rpms and as such the curves look slightly different especially at 1,000 rpms and redline than if the sampling rate was every 100 rpms, etc. However it does show the curves for both engines for comparison which is really what I was trying to convey. For reference here is Fords engine dyno.

|
You did about as best as could be done given fords odd value choices. With the engine generating less tq than hp, you would think ford would scale torque at say 500 vs 600 but instead they made the torque seem even less substantial by using a 600 scale... I don't understand why manufacture's scale dyno's at anything differing from 1:1 tq and hp scales. Every dyno I've ever had performed had equal max scale values for both, with hp/tq being equal at 5252.
Again great work on your part, it's just manufacturers messing with an unbroken system to advertise their own marketing points. Maybe ford wanted to show its so rev happy, I am legitimately unmoved and jaded by the choice as I wanted a legitimate dyno to look at but ford chose to leave that up to people with the desire to make a proper graph. Good work nonetheless.
__________________
Silver 03 cobra coupe
-Full mm/ftbr chassis, built irs/t56, 3.73s, trutrac
-Braces, 6pt, flsc's, brembos, rotary forged sochi's
-9.3/1 Livernois 5.3 modular, Diamond, Carrillo etc
-FGT heads stage 3 PnP'd, MMR stage 3 turbo grinds
-FR500c, custom split maf dual inlet, single blade etc
-Comp 62/65 T4's 3xbb, oil/water cooled, blankets etc
-CG Fab. ff headers, custom 3" hotside, Tial wastegates
-Dual in/out 3" cold side, Tial bov's, Truboost, SCT, NGk
-Custom 8qt oil, dual 405s return fuel with id2000's, etc
|