View Single Post
Old 06-08-2015, 12:27 PM   #134
xc_SS/RS


 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: somewhere in MD
Posts: 4,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by tt335ci03cobra View Post
Nice work but those graphs =/= comparable. The gt350 graph is scales with 550hp and 600tq iirc from the ford release. Also, you can easily tell that both vehicles power and torque crosses aren't at 5252rpms which they have to be because physics. The gt350's is crossing at about 5500ish. Lastly, the 20tq gap from the 481tq peak of the ls7 to the 500 line is much larger than the gap from the 400 line to the gt350's 429tq. It should be the other way because 19 is a smaller number than 29 so the gaps should be noticeably reflective of that difference. The major issue is that ford opted to release a useless graph with a 600 tq value and 550hp. On fords graph hp and torque cross in the 45-4800rpm range iirc.

Lastly, the gt350 makes nearly peak power well into 8,000rpms as the ford dyno release showed. In the graph listed here, it falls off far worse than it should from 7500rpm.

The ls7 is great but I would like to see Chevy revise it to about 550hp. It has the potential and would help Chevy continue to command an ls7 premium. As it sits, the 455-460hp 6.2 is too close to the ls7's output to command a typical $25-40k premium. Many have argued the majority of the z28's $75k price (advertised as the cost of the vehicle) is because an ls7 is a $20k+ crate engine. I wonder what a z28 with a 460hp 6.2 would really leave on the table vs an ls7 z28. Price wise it would likely have left $15-20k in a buyers pocket.
I dunno the suspension is also fairly pricey as are the brakes, wheels and tires so those probably jack the price up decently. The engine will certainly be cause for a lot of the price increase though for sure.
__________________
2010 2SS/RS
Z/28 intake, NW, FAST 102, speed engineering LT's, some exhaust, ATI -10% pulley, GM flex fuel injectors, DSX flex fuel sensor, MGW shifter, HP Tuners, some suspension work, stickers and a little weight loss. 12.63 @113.53
xc_SS/RS is offline   Reply With Quote