Quote:
Originally Posted by MEDISIN
Show me a better off the shelf track car in a 2+2 for less.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon
You are right folks really wanted a 75k Camaro. I guess the same way they have decided folks want a 85K CTS-V. Chevy made the decision to screw the average buyer in an attempt to win praise from editors. When is the next 20% or more discount coming to help move these "off the shelf track cars" out of the dealers showrooms.
Funny how things work out, Dodge can't build enough Hellcats even when dealers are tacking on outrageous mark ups, and Chevy can't give away their track star even with deep discounts. My guess is Ford will have Dodge's problem with their GT350 and not Chevy's.
|
Newmoon, good deflection.
In reading your posts from other threads, it's obvious how you feel about the Z/28 based off your opinion of the car which is based off of what you've read, so it's no reason to discuss that here.
Sales of the car speak for itself, which is due to price, not it's performance based off what it was designed to do.
Can you answer MEDISIN's question above? I add, show me a current car in production that's better off the shelf (stock production) track car in a 2+2 for less.
The GT350 will possibly be a great if not a little better contender but it's not in production yet and hasn't been thoroughly tested by pro's like the Z/28. So, that car shouldn't be included in your answer. May I also add that a GT350R w/electronics package is over 66.5K MSRP which is very close to what Z/28's are selling for because many Z's have discounts.
As a matter of reference only: in several cases where many of us purchased during the 20% year end event, we were able to purchase Z/28's at or near the cost of an optioned out GT350 w/o the R package. Again, the 20% event was for all of Chevy's oldest inventory, not just Camaro's or specifically, Z/28.