Quote:
Originally Posted by rocket403
Doesn't hurt my feelings at all I'll take the Dodge like the style better, just because it says CTS-V doesn't mean that I would buy it. I like the blend of old and new in the Dodge and don't like Caddy each to his own you like it so you have it good for you.
If I was going to spend 65k for a car I would get the Hellcat, and that's like saying your feelings are hurt because the Hellcat is very close in price to the CTS-V.
|
I agree with you (shocking). Hellcat is a lot of car for $65k and no one would ever criticize that purchase. I happen to like the Cadillac more than the Dodge, just my opinion. Although similar in price they have
vastly different intentions and audiences. Some people on this forum think that car purchases revolve around quarter-mile times and attempt to distill every conversation down to that metric. Have I raced the V? You bet. But it feels downright lethargic compared to my other go-fast toys. The V is a balanced, powerful, luxury sedan with all the creature comforts to haul the kiddos around in. Nothing more. Why it keeps getting drug into this conversation I'll never know
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocket403
I think you are hurt that the Insurance is higher on the CTS-V than the HellCat
|
Haha maybe, I dunno. We pay $64/month for full coverage on the V through USAA. The SS was $67/month and the Z06 is only $58/month but it is listed as recreational.