View Single Post
Old 01-09-2015, 12:42 PM   #2728
MEDISIN

 
Drives: 2011 CTS-V Sedan
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
FACT:

THERE ARE NO AVAILABLE MODIFICATIONS FOR THE HELLCATS
Really? Drag radials, stripped interior, race gas, fudging numbers, all quick ways to deceptively yield quicker times.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
They FULLY disclosed that the one car had DR's and race fuel, they provided the conditions in both cases.
I'm more concerned about what they failed to disclose. Are the results repeatable?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
FACT: The magazine runs were not done on a prepared surface
Which is why I posted times for the ZL1 and GT500 too. What do you think the ZL1 or GT500 would run on a well-prepped track?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
FACT: The 3 confirmed times that a run was done on a proper drag strip, on stock tires, has produced an 11.05, 11.4 and 12.1. ALL trapped at a MPH indicating low 11 second times. The 12.1 trapped at 126 MPH, which indicates traction was an issue from the start. That means that 2 out of the 3 runs on a track were within the realm of Dodge's stated times for stock tires, one within 2/10ths slower, one the same delta faster.
There have been far more than three Hellcats at drag strips in the last 6 months. Where are all these basement 11 timeslips hiding???

Of course traction is an issue. It's a 700hp car on 275's. Another testament to Dodge's failure to provide a proper platform for such power.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
You consistently throw up the magazine times while being ever reliable to not disclose that they were not done on a prepared surface, which Dodge always said the claimed times were on. Now, when runs ON a prepared surface come up, you dismiss the ones close to the Dodge stated time while pointing at the 12.1 time..while also forgetting to mention the trap MPH which is a better indicator of performance.
NONE of the times below are on a prepped surface. ZL1 and GT500 times are even better on a prepped surface. What's your point?

Car&Driver:
Hellokitty: 0-60, 3.6sec; 1/4mile 11.7 @ 126mph; 4488lbs automatic
---GT500: 0-60, 3.5sec; 1/4mile 11.8 @ 125mph; 3891lbs
Hellokitty: 0-60, 3.9sec; 1/4mile 11.9 @ 124.0mph; 4468lbs
------ZL1: 0-60, 4.1sec; 1/4mile 12.3 @ 119mph; 4120lbs

MotorTrend:
---GT500: 0-60, 3.8sec; 1/4mile 11.6 @ 125.7mph; 3871lbs
Hellokitty: 0-60, 3.7sec; 1/4mile 11.7 @ 125.4mph; 4449lbs automatic
------ZL1: 0-60, 3.9sec, 1/4mile 12.2 @ 116.6mph; 4051lbs

Edmunds:
---GT500: 0-60, 3.9sec, 1/4mile 12.1 @ 120.6mph; 3870lbs
-----ZL1: 0-60, 4.1sec, 1/4mile 12.4 @ 116.0mph
Hellokitty: 0-60, 4.8sec; 1/4mile 12.5 @ 118.8mph; 4454lbs

Road&Track:
---GT500: 0-60, 3.5sec, 1/4mile 11.7 @ 128.1mph
Hellokitty: 0-60, 3.9sec, 1/4mile 12.0 @ 124.8mph
------ZL1: 0-60, 3.9sec, 1/4mile 12.1 @ 119.9mph
MEDISIN is offline   Reply With Quote