No, you are cherry picking data in a desperate attemept to support your misguided notion that the Boss is somehow as fast as the ZL1.
But since you brought up the Boss, let's look at the data. In a DIRECT comparison, the ZL1 was 2/10th's faster to 60, 3/10th's quicker in the quarter trapping 3.5mph faster.
Boss 302
Car&Driver: 0-60, 4.2sec; 1/4mile 12.7 @ 114mph; 3641lbs
Laguna Seca
Road&Track: 0-60, 4.0sec; 1/4mile 12.3 @ 115.8mph; 3621lbs
Laguna Seca
MotorTrend: 0-60, 4.0sec; 1/4mile 12.4 @ 113.9mph; 3638lbs
Laguna Seca
Car&Driver: 0-60, 4.3sec; 1/4mile 12.8 @ 113mph; 3666lbs
MotorTrend: 0-60, 4.0sec; 1/4mile 12.3 @ 115.9; 3621lbs
Camaro ZL1
Car&Driver: 0-60, 4.1sec; 1/4mile 12.3 @ 119mph; 4120lbs
MotorTrend: 0-60, 3.8sec; 1/4mile 12.1 @ 117.4mph; 4051lbs
Edmunds: 0-60, 4.1sec, 1/4mile 12.4 @ 116.0mph
Road&Track: 0-60, 3.9sec, 1/4mile 12.1 @ 119.9mph
MotorTrend: 0-60, 3.9sec, 1/4mile 12.2 @ 116.6mph; 4051lbs
Average for Boss: 0-60, 4.1sec, 1/4mile 12.5 @ 114.5mph
Average for ZL1: 0-60, 3.9sec, 1/4mile 12.2 @ 117.8mph
Given the weight, power, and price, this is exactly what I would expect.
Here is the ZL1 review.
Now on to the Camaro. Chevrolet rates the ZL1's LSA 6.2-liter supercharged V-8 at an SAE-certified 580 hp and 556 lb-ft of torque.
Our six-speed manual tester put down 472 hp and 482 lb-ft of torque to the rear wheels, which K&N noted was about 20 fewer wheel horsepower than it was used to seeing from a stock Camaro ZL1. Assuming a 10-percent drivetrain loss for the manual Camaromeans the LSA is making 524 hp and 536 lb-ft of torque at the crank. While a bit lower than expected, it's worth noting that our
ZL1 tester's test track numbers were exactly what we'd expect from a ZL1.
I know this hurts.