Quote:
Originally Posted by macwest
Difference with this round is new interior, shaker hood and scat pack option on base model. Won't matter if SRT sales decline because over all sales should increase. However, I suspect the Hellcat will sell over their estimate. Big part to read into what is being said is that the said "will make what is ordered" meaning if more then alloted amount is ordered they will make them. What I believe is trying to be avoided is cars sitting like the viper did or in GM's case the z/28 which currently is sitting in may lots collecting dust.
|
So it's the new interior that will push sales? Up until now, people have purchased the Mustang and Camaro over the Challenger because of the interior??
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon
About the same as the ZL1 and GT500 or CTSV are beyond the means of their 99.99% faithful using your extreme logic. I know it hurts but really you should try and control the tears a little 
|
Seeing as how the average transaction prices for GM and FoMoCo are considerably closer to the respective prices of those three vehicles vs the ATP for Chrysler and the asking price for the Hellokitty, said vehicles are more attainable than the Hellokitty is for a Dodge shopper. E for effort though.
You still didn't answer my question. What makes this different than the SRT Core models that were supposed to cater to enthusiasts (offering a stripped down performance Challenger without the bells and whistles)? They didn't sell, and Dodge nixed them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4VFTW
looks like MEDISIN's hate tank is on fumes...hes down to ad hominems at this point.
I'm perfectly ok with Dodge building niche cars for hot rodders...let GM build more V6 Camaros for everyone else.
|
Hot rodders build their own cars.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truck Norris
I'm now kicking around the idea of a RT 392 Scat Pack manual which someone here said was $37,xxx msrp so knowing how heavily Dodge can discount its vehicles it may be possible to get into a 392 Challenger for $34,xxx.
$35k'ish would be kick ass especially after listening to the vid of Richard Rawlings showing off its "factory dumps" sure it wont be as quick as the 8 speed auto but I will have more fun with the exhaust barking, popping and blurbling every time I shift and can go WOT more often without the risk of speeding. Plus there would be less chance of me getting bored with it especially when taking it to the track. With a (485hp)manual you can always improve on something vs mashing the gas and keeping in straight. I do want to wait and see how the lighter weight 'cuda turns out.
|
The most reasonable and informative response I have seen yet. Thank you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife
I believe the difference between the 392 Rt and the SRT8 is the SRT8 gets a version of the Hellcats braking system, the electronic adjustable suspension, a much much better audio system as well as a much more refined and upscale interior.
In many ways the 392 R/T "Scat Pack" get most of the old SRT 8 technology. The new SRT gets a lot of the Hellcat technology
|
I wasn't asking about the R/T vs SRT, I was asking how the R/T shatpack is supposed to improve sales over the failed "SRT Core" models that Dodge launched in 2013 and discontinued in 2014.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocket403
No plans on a Cuda or lighter Challenger till 2018 as far as I know, but if you wait until the hype as had a chance to die you may get a better price. They do discount more than Ford or Chevy has in the past.
|
They HAVE to pile cash on the hood, just to make ends. Dodge is -3.8% YOY and getting outsold by Jeep.