Quote:
Originally Posted by DropTheGloves
You really have no idea about these cars. Yes, they may be quicker stock, but they were also given more horsepower. Give me the difference in cash and the cobra will absolutely eat it alive. I mean alive. These cars have been tested with the same modifications, or around the same amount of horsepower and the cobra has won every time basically. You also need to learn what a sn95 is. Not just that but for what the cobra is, it handles great. Do your research skipper. These cars are worth every dime.
|
don't know about that... the shelby's imo are better all around. terms are good no doubt, but i don't think the stock IRS will hold up to the kind of power both cars are capable of (600 + on stock internals, capable of much more than that even). on the other hand, the Shelby has the solid rear that i think is bulletproof for the most part and with just a few upgrades you can put that power to the ground real easy. the cobra is lighter because the SN95 is a lighter overall platform but i think the shelby overall is the better ride... still don't know why terms are priced where they're at still but lately i've seen them coming down in price to high teens... they were priced mid to low 20s for awhile. i'd rather go with the Shelby if i had the money. slicks, control arms, pulley swap, cai and tune and that's enough for me... plus i prefer the looks... i like both cars though
high teens, low miles might be worth a shot though... don't know if i'd pay 25K for a term that has 30K miles, 18 - 19K is a different story