Quote:
Originally Posted by Glen e
ok a few things:
1. gm will show that this is a dealer issue and needs to be resolved between you and the dealer
2. any court will agree that since gm is just in a sales sgreement with the dealer, they cannot be joined in court. They refunded to the dealer the same amount as other dealers also received.
3. you and the dealer will fight it out legally
4. state laws prohibit from gm punishing a dealer by reducing allocation. Until a dealer is cancelled for bankruptcy or creation of a felony, allocation is off limits.
|
Again, thanks for your insight. As for,
1. I am waiting for GM to resolve this with my dealer as it says that is what it is trying to do. If GM comes back to me and says it cannot resolve this on its level, that this is the problem and responsibility of my dealer and not it, then I can go back to my dealer armed with that argument. Until then, my dealer shall continue to put this on GM as it shorting me and not it.
2. Never-the-less, I shall bring it to court if need be, and have the court so advise me I cannot bring suit against GM on its failed Price Protection policy and program over which it has no control with its dealer agents. Then, on to my dealer if so ruled. I understand you are saying GM gives back $2,768 to all dealers on a Price Protected Z51.
3. Yes, likely my dealer, but first GM, and the court shall have to tell me not GM. In the interim, I imagine there would be further discussion between GM with my dealer if and when I file first against GM. In any case, I shall maintain engagement with GM and my dealer for as long as possible and as far as I may go with this. Neither GM or my dealer should have a comfort zone on this for as long as I can engage them.
4. GM has been pretty loosey goosy with dealers about allocation on C7s. Allocations change continually with a fluidity as to rhyme and reason. GM does not have to "punish" dealers per say, but it still controls allocation on its terms whatever they may be.
Again, thanks, your insight shall help me as I go forward with this.