Quote:
Originally Posted by MLL67RSSS
Could you please direct me to any site that shows any of the cases mentioned are incorrect or non-factual. His information came from court documents. I have and open mind, please enlighten me and show me where his information is shown to be incorrect.
|
if you read my post i dont ever say he is inaccurate...he is simply redirecting on some of the cases, implying that they all are incorrect, he is amazingly biased and only reporting the few factual points he wants to......
Ill stand by my statement that non of that matters....
The fact that GM knew they had a faulty part that was potentially dangerous and not only chose not to fix it and on top of that covered it up is the issue and its criminal
For that matter any company knowing they are selling something faulty and choosing not to fix it and telling the customer they were wrong when it was pointed out and continuing to sell that product even after that is pretty slimy to begin with, not even counting possible hazards to the owner.
At best GM has shown themselves to be pretty unethical and slimy by continuing to sell a product they knew was defective in some way.
But back to your question...please point out or link where I stated that anything reported was inaccurate.