Thread: '10 Tarus ST
View Single Post
Old 06-02-2008, 01:34 AM   #12
MAC
Iroc-Z <3'r
 
MAC's Avatar
 
Drives: '87 5.7L Iroc-Z
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 392
Quote:
Originally Posted by vetterxx View Post
The SHO's are alot better than a regular Tarus, but honestly, they are really going to have to work hard to make this a car that anyone looking for something even mildly sporty would want to drive. I'm not even going to talk about how ford interiors are getting cheaper by the second. At least GM is getting the idea that people don't really like melted down army men for dashes.
I don't think they'll have to work TOO hard, as most *normal* families, want a "safe car" that has some umph, I think it'll be a decent seller. they weren't smart to ditch the SHO when they did. imo.
they've done a pretty decent job advertising the fusion, as well as the old Five Hundred, I don't really understand why they renamed the five hundred to a Taurus & ditched the five hundred. but whatever. remember the Taurus used to be one of the best selling sedans..and with its recent advertisement, I think a performance trim will be good for it. as long as it's fuel efficient and is as sturdy as the old Taurus, it'll do well.
put a better engine in it, all the more to it.
I'll add more later about my experience with the '98 Taurus i currently have, gotta go to work, freakin lost track of time go me. =/
__________________


"Camaro Z/28 is back. Gentlemen, Don't even bother to start your engines."
MAC is offline   Reply With Quote