|
I think the people on top that can take the hits should. I have a buddy with a retired fisherman from Alaska as a stepfather. He has 3 condos in Miami, and a house in Alaska- and whats the point why does he need 3 condos when some people can't even afford a small piddly house. I agree that low paying jobs are better than no jobs, but you have to realize that the workers aren't in the best wishes of the CEO if they are striking and hes getting a large percentage in bonuses. As for the destruction of the domestic auto industry- it seems like the CEO's are doing that to their own companies if they won't help the people that are doing the work for them just because they wont be able to get enough for that next new house or plane.
I don't know how you can tie the failure of business and blame it on the workers when the 1 CEO is making more than 50% of the rest of the company. Please, please don't take this offensively but I mean its simple math x > y and that isnt fair when it is only 1 person making the x and 70 people or more are the y
|