View Single Post
Old 06-19-2013, 01:39 PM   #209
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
your opinion too, your biased GM opinion, most people, including the mags, find the Charger interior a very good one, high quality, and is just as good as the SS interior whether you want it to be or not. And again, the black on the front end is the person's choice, they also come with that portion body color if preferred. Again, I actually like understated, to a point and the SS just has nothing to realy set it apart from looking like a G8 and 2013 Impala had a baby. The fact is that GMs other offerings are what puts the SS style in a bad light. the CTS, the Impala, the ATS ALL do elegance AND aggressive better than the SS, yes I said the 14 Impala looks more aggressive than the SS because it does. And please don't compare the SS interior to the new CTS interior, there truly is no comparison there.
Im going to agree with Stew partially on this one. While the Dodge interior is nicer than in recent years, it still looks dated and bad IMO.

The SS Interior IMO is way better.

The part I agree with Stew on, is that GM has put out some incredible designs that look aggressive, sporty, classy and muscular. And I know they were handicapped with this one bc they had to work with what Holden came up with, but to me, this car lacks any soul in the looks department. To my eyes, the SS is a boring design. I bet this car is gonna perform great, I bet its going to be a blast to drive, and I bet everybody that gets one will love it, but the exterior is so boring.

The SS to me, is about as exciting as a Buick. Not saying its ugly, I think Buick is turning out some great looking cars, the SS looks good as a regular sedan. Not as a sport sedan to me. it doesnt have that wow factor that I think a sport sedan should have.
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote