View Single Post
Old 06-19-2013, 11:14 AM   #207
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cmicasa the Great XvX View Post
Sticking to the point. and not veering off as this thread had done.. The Cruze vs G8 FRONT.. FRONT.. FRONT.. is about as agressive looking, but alas the Cruze is a compact car meant for economic, downsized driving and not a perfromance sedan meant for tight cornering and burn-outs... (altho it could be GM with just some quick supension upgrades and the Verano's Turbo 2.0L).

I've driven an '11 SRT.. a 12 RT and a V6 '13 Charger.. and the interior is MEH at best... ironically it looks as "nice" as a 2009 Pontiac G8's. Of Course it is a Dodge.. so it's expected.



On a side I don't support Italian, Japanese, Korean, or German companies, so I'm a bit biased. While I recognize the great styling of certain models, and even engineering.. Dodge ain't it. And If I wanted an SS to look as Juvenile as the Charger SRT, again.. I'd spray-paint it
your opinion too, your biased GM opinion, most people, including the mags, find the Charger interior a very good one, high quality, and is just as good as the SS interior whether you want it to be or not. And again, the black on the front end is the person's choice, they also come with that portion body color if preferred. Again, I actually like understated, to a point and the SS just has nothing to realy set it apart from looking like a G8 and 2013 Impala had a baby. The fact is that GMs other offerings are what puts the SS style in a bad light. the CTS, the Impala, the ATS ALL do elegance AND aggressive better than the SS, yes I said the 14 Impala looks more aggressive than the SS because it does. And please don't compare the SS interior to the new CTS interior, there truly is no comparison there.

Last edited by Stew; 06-19-2013 at 11:27 AM.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote