Sure people have run both faster
and slower times than what gets reported in automotive magazines. Not everyone is going to run a hero time in
perfect conditions every time. That is why averaging times reported under standardized testing methodologies creates the closest apples-to-apples comparison outside of a same day head-to-head comparisons (which hopefully we will see when the SS is released).
The Camaro SS
is on average a 13-sec car.
Motor Trend: SS 13.1 sec @ 110.8 mph
Car and Driver: SS 13.0 sec @ 111 mph
Road & Track: SS 13.0 sec @ 110.7 mph
Inside Line: SS 13.1 sec @ 110.4 mph
Average SS = 13.05 sec @ 110.7mph
Have I seen SS times in the high 12's, yes. And I've also seen SS times in the mid-13's.
MotorTrend and C&D tested the manual, R&T tested the auto. The times were identical. Look how little variation appears in the GXP results. Very consistent times from three different sources on three different days in three different locations with two different transmissions.
Right, right, the R/T's that Dodge sent MotorTrend, Edmunds, and Road & Track for testing to "show-off" in magazines were somehow handicapped compared to the model Dodge sold customers?? I have seen stock R/T's run in mid-low 13's and I have seen GXP's run high 12's. But when you average their results and look at what the average car will run on a given day, there is a clear difference between R/T and GXP performance, with the GXP being
much closer to SRT8 performance than it is to R/T.
Holy run-on sentence. Where to begin...Yes the LX platform developed for the W211 Mercedes-Benz E-Class was a great platform (exotic is a stretch) when it was developed in the late '90's. The problem is the platform is outdated and weighs 200-300lbs more than the competition. That "generic" Holden design is the Zeta platform, designed as GM's global RWD architecture. Zeta has better driving/handling characteristics and lower weight than the LX.
Go drive a Zeta-based vehicle like the SS 1LE, ZL1, or the upcoming SS sedan and you'll understand why drivers prefer it over the LX equivalents. One needs look no further than
Lightning Lap times to see the advantage.
Hmmm, compared to your '92 Lumina perhaps. It's a good car for the money.
And I thought lead was dense. The GXP outperformed its SRT8 rival back in 2009
and cost less when similarly equipped. Once again the SS looks to be slightly less than SRT8 performance for less than SRT8 money (2-tenths slower to 60, 3-tenths and 3mph slower in the quarter for $2,250 less).
R/T: 0-60 in 5.3, 13.8 1/4mile at 103mph, $36,495 (R/T Max)
GXP: 0-60 in 4.7, 13.1 1/4mile at 109mph, $44,000 (proxy for SS)
SRT8: 0-60 in 4.5, 12.8 1/4mile at 112mph $46,250