View Single Post
Old 05-31-2013, 07:40 PM   #72
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by 05stram View Post
Dodge just announced it for this model year and Ford is coming - GM SHOULD release the engine they shelved.

http://www.media.chrysler.com/newsre...d=13869&mid=70
The one confirmed diesel half ton is going to be going into the Ram. But correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't it make 'only' 420 ft-lbs? Granted, it peaks early but looking at the graph of the LT1, its truck bound cousin should have nearly as much grunt at the low end even more at peak, and roughly 200 more hp. Additionally, the Ecoboost available now makes the same torque at a slightly higher RPM as the Chrysler oil burner will, and has an additional 100 hp. Sure, the Ram diesel should destroy both those engines in fuel economy, but the statement that started this little side discussion was about torque.


All that said ... I agree that GM really should dust off the 4.5L diesel V6
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote