View Single Post
Old 05-03-2013, 08:21 PM   #28
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Q'smuscle View Post
FenwickHockey65 Already, yea I know it's basically a impala I think looks better personally just me. And people care that its rear wheel drive because Americans like muscle cars and nomatter what some might say people do consider the 94-96 a muscle car. DGthe3
People can think what they like. But that doesn't change the fact that the Impala was never a sports sedan. Muscle car? Arguable, but for the vast majority of its life the Impala was not even a muscle car. It was just a big car that needed a big engine to move itself along with reasonable speed. I'd even hesitate to call the 94-96 cars 'muscle'. They weighed over 2 tons and made well under 300 hp. Those are not the makings of a muscle car.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote