View Single Post
Old 04-01-2013, 11:31 PM   #25
fielderLS3


 
fielderLS3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Mazda6, 2011 Mustang 5.0
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Portage, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
....you mean V8s with cylinder de-activation don't you??

Otherwise...it wouldn't happen.

Also, I know a certain hopped up Turbo V6 on here that will run low 11s and likely gets as good or better MPGs as your GT.
You really dislike like AFM don't you. This V8 beats TTV6 efficiency with cylinder de-activation. Without, I bet it would still match it. For the record, I'm only against turbos in cases when they provide no performance or efficiency advantage for the extra cost and complexity. I'm not against turbos in cases when they provide significant performance and/or efficiency benefits that justify their cost. In fact, family members have bought 2 turbo cars in the last year based on my recommendations.

Low 11s? Could you elaborate?

Stock vs. modded is a pointless comparison. Anything will run anything if cost and durability are no object. Since you asked, my GT gets around 29-30 MPG on the highway consistently as long as I use ethanol-free gas. My best tank last summer broke 31.
__________________
2022 1SS 1LE (Arrived 4/29/22)
"The car is the closest thing we will ever create to something that is alive."
. 2022 1SS 1LE (Coming Soon)

Last edited by fielderLS3; 04-01-2013 at 11:43 PM.
fielderLS3 is offline   Reply With Quote