View Single Post
Old 03-18-2013, 03:03 PM   #28
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,969
Quote:
Originally Posted by truth411 View Post
Actually I'd argue base on this engine the LT1 makes more sense from a buisness and performance perspective. If the atsv came with this LF3 it would probably get whiped from the next M3, Merc C class, S4 etc... Which all will probably have more hp, heck the Merc has more power already. Also from what im seeing the LT1 might be more fuel efficient or atleast equal to it, so why not the LT1 again???
Yeah I'm not convinced this LF3 will make it into the ATS-V either.

That said, if GM was willing to give this engine a different tune in the ATS-V its capable of bigger numbers easily. The N/A engine is build fairly strong with some forged internals already. Lots of V6 guys here are running FI applications at 450 and more HP and not one has popped yet.

This version comes with stronger rods and other parts which makes it even more reliable. I say putting it up to 450/450 would be a breeze. I guarantee we will see custom tunes putting it at or near 500+.

Anyways, custom tunes aside, I'm very curious to see where else they may use this engine, as it seems like they won't be using it in the Silverado. Would this make any sense in the new Colorado/Canyon trucks?
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote