View Single Post
Old 04-13-2008, 10:32 PM   #13
Scotsman
Auto Pilot
 
Scotsman's Avatar
 
Drives: Gunmetal
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: L.A.
Posts: 1,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
Sure it is. If the extra "equipment" wasn't in the cars, they wouldn't cost as much. So the cost savings of using E85, etc (i.e a cheaper fuel) would be amplified even more.

I realize I might be coming off a little agressive, what with the point, counter-point and all. But my issue is not about the fuel economy. I'm all for more efficient cars; whole heartedly! But we could have reached this goal soon enough, so my problem is that it was forced on the industry, which means higher cost to implement this stuff NOW, as opposed to over time, where the costs would have been spread out.
I'm saying that 35 mpg CAFE is REAL, it's not a fictitious idea and we can just dismiss.

Off-topic but I think with increased purchase price for cars people will probably be forced to hold onto their cars longer, and I know this will effect lease payments as well. Unintended consequences.
__________________
"Let the rest of the world dream of Ferraris, Lamborghinis and dinky little British two-seaters. In this country speed doesn't look like that." Got SS?
Scotsman is offline   Reply With Quote