View Single Post
Old 02-10-2013, 01:47 PM   #22
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyg36 View Post
Whatever engine it has, it better destroy the M3. I hate that car with a passion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle2k View Post
Also, it's not like the LT1 would add considerable weight over a TTV6. I just feel like some of these explanations that I am getting in this thread are from the perspective of a bean counter more than an enthusiast. They will have their say - there is no need for that sort of stuff to be parroted to us. Once again, I feel like a successful business plan would be a cut throat attitude not "well it should have enough to compete"
I think what your getting is reality.

Yep, you can shoe horn a small block into anything. Remember the Mallet Solstice conversion?

And yes, the RS5 has a V8 and that car, like the ATS is simply a RWD Cruze in size.

But any V8 will be a packaging challenge in a car that size. The Audi has a 4.2 L V8, not a 6.2 L.

Tip of the hat to AMG getting their 6.3 L in a C-Class. But I believe that is a RWD only model.
Right now you can't get the RS4 here :( . And it's also a $70,000 car.

So can or will GM cram an LT1 into an ATS? Could fit. Fits under the hood of the C7.

But I think if you put a 450/450 engine and the transmission and axle needed to accomodate that torque you will be very nearly at CTS-V weight and performance. So then it simply becomes two awesome cars at the same price point and you just pick what size you want.

There has to be a difference between an ATS-V if one ever exists and a CTS-V. And hopefully GM has that worked out somehow.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote