Chevrolet Corvette Stingray C7 Forum - View Single Post

*DGthe3* · 04-08-2008, 08:55 PM

There are a few differences between now and then. First, hp is calculated differently now. Its net power not gross power. However, engines back then were often under rated anyway so those probably balance out. Secondly, tires have come a long way since then. Plus, there has probably been a great reduction in drive line losses over the last 40 or so years.

Also, I've heard that the Chevelle's weight was around 3500 lbs with the big block, not 3260.

04-08-2008, 08:55 PM	#7
DGthe3 Moderator.ca Drives: 05 Grand Am GT Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Niagara, Canada Posts: 25,366	There are a few differences between now and then. First, hp is calculated differently now. Its net power not gross power. However, engines back then were often under rated anyway so those probably balance out. Secondly, tires have come a long way since then. Plus, there has probably been a great reduction in drive line losses over the last 40 or so years. Also, I've heard that the Chevelle's weight was around 3500 lbs with the big block, not 3260. __________________ Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them __________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!! __________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum