View Single Post
Old 01-16-2013, 10:38 AM   #26
CamaroSkooter
Retarded One-Legged Owl
 
CamaroSkooter's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 9,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
Pretty easy. Door frames are completely different, no more three-piece bumper up front, new fender flares, side moldings are now integrated into the sheet metal, extended cabs no longer have suicide doors, crew cab rear doors are longer, new grille/crossbar/headlights, integrated spoiler in the tailgate, need I go on?
Put them side-by-side, then put on your uncle's eyeglasses (or whoever in your family has bad vision) and they'll look identical

Quote:
Originally Posted by AZCamaroFan View Post
i'm not sure that's it or not. anyone seen how much of the rear opens up?
if they were going that route i would just as soon had them close up the rear completely like the 63' and maintain the wrap-around window
Right, because the 1963 Corvette can pass 2013 safety standards

That piece of metal, although part of the rear lift up window/gate thing, probably has a pretty significant impact on the ability of the car to not crumple in a collision. Just like how the driver's and passenger's side door is a structural member of the car, even though it can still open...

I imagine the slow-motion crash video of any vehicle would look significantly different if the doors were removed.
__________________

My VIN = 2G1FK1EJ9A9105017
Build Date: 04-23-2009 according to:
http://www.compnine.com/vid.php
CamaroSkooter is offline   Reply With Quote