View Single Post
Old 10-29-2012, 12:26 PM   #17
CamaroDreams07


 
CamaroDreams07's Avatar
 
Drives: Slow V6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 9,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Awesome View Post
Drag is proportional to the square of the speed of the moving object.

FD=1/2ρv*2CDA

FD is the force of drag, which is by definition the force component in the direction of the flow velocity

ρ is the mass density of the fluid

v is the velocity of the object relative to the fluid

A is the reference area

CD is the drag coefficient

Since everything else is the same except for velocity, the drag is directly proportional to the square of the speed.

So the drag on a car going 203MPH versus 220MPH could be expressed as

41209/48400 = 85.1%

In theory, it should take just under 15% less horsepower to get the identical car moving 203MPH instead of 220MPH.



So, there must be other losses at work here...
You lost me on all of that. I'm just relaying what I saw on Top Gear UK when they reviewed the Veyron.

*We have armadillos in our trousers. It's really quite frightening*
__________________
[B]
CamaroDreams07 is offline   Reply With Quote