View Single Post
Old 10-04-2012, 09:43 PM   #5
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
Considering the article is a year and a half old and I haven't read much about it since then, I don't think it really sent Shock Waves anywhere. Later articles are a rehash of the same stuff, and still predicting something that works a year out.

This is a wait and see. And likely a long wait. There is a long road between a demonstration of principle and practicality.

Also, I would love to see how they think this will save 1,000 pounds.
I caught that too. They claimed it could save 1000 lbs vs 'current engine systems'. What the heck weighs that much in a normal car? Engines tend to weigh somewhere between what, 250 and 500 lbs (I4-V8)? Even if this could somehow eliminate the need for a transmission, thats only another ... 150-250? Where could the rest even come from?
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote