Quote:
Originally Posted by aSSian
no, he didn't give it back. lol
Overall, Pacquiao landed 253 punches to Bradley's total of 159.
Pacquiao was more accurate, especially with his power punches. He landed 190 power punches to Bradley's 108.
|
Don't judge based off the Compubox stats alone. I have partners I spar with that I can barely take more than 15-20 punches without taking pain. Then there are others who could hit me 50-80 times and I would barely feel it.
The fact is that Bradley ate Pac's punches like they were nothing and kept coming forward on badly injured feet the entire fight. Pac was getting hurt by Bradley no question.
You can't score boxing solely based off the number punches landed. If you throw a ton more punches and you cant hurt the guy, yet he throws fewer and hurts you, why do you deserve the win? Strength and damage of the punches is factored into the judges decision.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renegade
Do you honestly think Bradley beat Manny? Serious bro? "What are you smoking?" i suggest you re-watch that fight and forget what those lame referees had on the card cause i seen the entire fight on paperview and everyone was stunned even Bradley's family. He was so digust of himself he offered a re-match and didn't even had the "Balls" to say he won fair and square. His excuse? I got to re-watch the tape and then i'll make a better judgement.  Honestly i felt the fight was (Set up) for the refs to screw manny for another pay day.  Cause Manny smiled the entire time and took it like a champ.
Want facts? Every fighter gets hit sooner or later it's not impossible to hit by a South paw. A convict like Floyd who hit his baby mother several times and she press charges for domestic voilence and he got off easy served a few months in jail. If you ask me he has it coming.
Last ask yourself do the people want to see Bradley v.s Mayweather? 
I gaurantee Majority wants to see Manny v.s Mayweather the fight of the decade and it will have 10 folds bigger pay day. Just place your bets.  |
I'm going to rewatch that fight just for you because I have some free time. I'll type up a detailed analysis on why Bradley won if you'd like. From what I remember Bradley was backing up Pac for a majority of the rounds and causing much more damage. Bradley seemed completely unfazed by any of Pacs shots and kept coming forward. General boxing 101, if you're backing up the whole fight, you aren't winning.
Now your part about Floyd smh man. You can't bring Floyd's personal issues into discussion about his boxing skill. I hate how he conducts himself out of the ring but that doesn't for a second change my opinion of what he does in the ring.
Fact is, its highly likely he will dominate Pac, plain and simple.
And do most people want to see Mayweather vs Pac? Of course, but does that make it a good fight? NO! Just because the majority want to see it doesn't make it the better fight. People who actually understand boxing should recognize Bradley vs Mayweather will be a SIGNIFICANTLY more entertaining fight.
Why? Because Pac has extremely low chances while Bradley has a really good chance of beating Floyd. I don't get why Pac fans are in such extreme denial.