Quote:
Originally Posted by mickss
http://www.aluminum.org/AM/Template....ontentID=21182
As Quoted;
Conclusion
Comparing the relative ease and costs of repairing aluminum and steel, it is clear aluminum is not more difficult—just different. Different techniques are required, as is a clear understanding of the differences between steel and aluminum alloys and how they affect the repair process. Such understanding is readily available, as are the necessary specialized tools for proper repair of aluminum. As for training, I-CAR programs have been in existence for several years, and manufacturers and suppliers are providing the necessary instructional materials to assimilate repair of aluminum into everyday shop practices.
As automotive aluminum use continues to climb due to its performance, safety, and environmental advantages, its repair will become as commonplace and routine as that of traditional materials.
|
Your article assumes that all of the training, materials, and equipment needed for aluminum panel repair are just strewn around on the ground everywhere for anyone to pick up and use for free. This is patently false.
Someone has to pay for all of this new "stuff" and it's not going to be the business. Expect the prices for repairs to go up to pay for all of this dubious technology.
Also take these articles with a grain of salt. You don't necessarily know what agenda the writer may be pushing. You are quoting an article on the aluminum industry website. Ya think there's no chance of a bias there?
I recall reading a lot of enviros proudly proclaiming that water based car paints were just as good as petroleum based paints. Anyone with a new Camaro can attest to the lack of durability and the imperfections present in the wonderful new watercolor technology foisted upon consumers. The Camaro paint process is supposed to be the best #1 state of the art too! It's simply not as good as what we had before.