View Single Post
Old 05-18-2009, 07:04 PM   #33
theholycow


 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 GMC Sierra, '80 Lesabre
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morepwr View Post
Thats going to be very hard to achieve. People are pretty used to having all the luxury items on new cars. If they want more MPG, then they are going to have to shed some serious weight. So you get a econobox with power nothing.
The luxury items aren't what add up to all that weight. It's the big engines and transmissions, bulletproof frames that last 20 years in New England without rotting, large quantities of safety reinforcement (which nobody will ever ask them to remove), big wheels/tires with requisite suspension, and generally large size.

Weight doesn't have to be reduced to increase MPG, though. There's usually room for improvement in gearing, though GM's automatics tend to be geared for fuel economy. There's loads of room for aerodynamic improvement in modern cars; every car has a big gaping airplow/parachute grille that is entirely for aesthetic purposes and unnecessary for even the most extreme cooling, for example.
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios
2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong)
1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles
2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
she really underestimates the damage i would do to her reproductive organs
http://allOffTopic.com is the place for all the naughty stuff you can't get away with on this forum...
theholycow is offline