Quote:
Originally Posted by Mindz
So I was browsing over at another camaro forums and I come across a "friend's" post.
Anyone know what CamaroScotty seems to be talking shit about Tag? Why did he post that there?
Link
|
I dont really think that Scotty was talking isht about Tag. I think he was referring to how the original 1st CGM was supposed to go to Tran, but Tran changed the interior options last minute and there was no official "dont build this car till the order is completely figured out" message. Tag was next in line and basically got bumped to the front and Tran was pushed back in the list.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TAG UR IT
Yep. That was pointed out to me a looooooong time ago. Geez....that makes me wonder if there quite possibly have been "others" on there.................................
.................................................. ..............................
Just remember...when you post something, EVERYONE reads it.
And Tim,
Thank you very much for the kind words over there. If you read this, maybe we'll meet up at Carlisle. 
|
Doug, I really dont think that he was meaning any ill intent about it... just some possible frustration over the whole you/tran/1stCGM issue. ya know.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtahvit
You have to read the whole thread.
Someone posted that Doug (Tag) got the first CGM.
Scotty's post is a complaint that the 5thgen.org owner didn't get his CGM first. Meaning, Scotty would rather have the 5th Gen guy get his car instead of Tag.
At least that is my interpretation of it.
Not the first time this has happened.
|
IDK....
Quote:
|
It should have been a 5thGen site owner....
|
he didnt say a 5thGen.org owner. just a 5th gen site owner... as in an owner of a 2010 camaro website.... such as Tran..... who initially had the first CGM on order but got bumped back in line after he changed some options on the car last minute.
Unless you can show me more posts of Scotty's where he has deliberately spouted crap about Tag or any other respected member (of any site), I think his wording is being taken out of context.