Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcAngel
The genisis is not awesome I found it uninspiring when I drove it.
|
I agree with this. It's a quick car...but...it's not a "whole" car...if that makes sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcAngel
yea it ended up that way and for me Mustang won hands down. The IRS and 111 hp difference disk translate into a huge performance dfference (.2 sec) so it came down to usability and creature comforts for the price and interior. Mustang for me wins hands down. Realisticaly I will never take my car to the track those days are over. So I am happy with Mustangs times and the fact that the live axle is almost nonexistant made the car quiet and smooth. I find no negatives with Mustang
|
Ironically, I started thinking along the same lines...then I went to compare for the things that I need in the car I want: HID lights, uplevel stereo, and cloth seating. The Mustang didn't match for me. And the closest match I had was $1000
more than the Camaro. Plus, I like the style of the Camaro's interior WAY better, and that's more important to me than material appointment (which, though not stellar, isn't "bad"). We've all seen Number 3 stuff two golf bags in the trunk, so I'm not too worried there. And I really like the added refinement the IRS gives the car (performance numbers aside). That ended the comparison for me: Camaro > than Mustang for Dragoneye.
But guess what? I realized that both cars have a place in the market, and niether one needs to 'beat' the other. The Mustang works for ArcAngel...the Camaro works for me...and so it goes for every single member on this site. I say screw the arguments: Drive your car, and wave the flag!
:flag2: