05-12-2009, 06:05 PM
|
#1079
|
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcAngel
Engine, transmission was very good. Handling was pretty good although the heft showed sometimes. Exterior liked everything ,except the grille. Interior I didnt like at all. Felt plain, hard and weird, but bland. Gauges where hard to read, and visibility I didnt like. The trunk was soooooooo small. BA sound system was really good as well.
In the end I liked that the Mustang has a Navigation w sync, I like the interior a lot!! The real aluminum, on the dash, the shifter etc etc aluminum trim soft touch ip. Also the car felt light, tossable, sweet turn in too! The steering was awesome much crisper than the Camaro. The trunk was a nice size with a good opening. To me there were certain things that would make the Camaro a good weekend car,but not a good daily, but the Mustang does both jobs well good daily driver and good weekend car! I hope this is good if any other questions just ask
|
how about the Acceleration? how would you compare it to the Camaro? AND 370z?
And isnt the mustang supposed to be cheaper? I just built one on their site and to it ended up being 34k after I made it liveable.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
|
|
|