[Number 3]

Originally Posted by Lou_Dorchen

That's not true. The Mustang vastly outsold the Camaro back then. And the base Mustangs didn't have V6s, they had 4-cylinders. While from 1986 on the base model Camaro had a V6, it wasn't until 1994 that the base model Mustang got a V6. So for the 3rd Gen years the Camaro was the better car in terms of the base models.


Year: Mustang/Camaro
86: 224,410/ 192,219
87: 159,145/ 137,760
88: 211,225/ 96,275
89: 209,769/ 110,850
90: 128,189/ 35,048
91: 98,737/ 101,316
92: 79,280/ 70,712
93: 114,228/ *39,755 (*) designates a redesign
94:*123,198/ 119,934 (*) designates a redesign
95: 185,986/ 122,844
96: 126,483/ 66,827
97: 100,254/ 95,812
98: 170,642/ 77,198
99: 126,067/ 42,098
00: 218,525/ 45,417
01: 155,162/ 29,009

http://www.camaroz28.com/forums/auto...e-needed-7419/

You missed my point. Show the V8 only volumes please.

And every year you have on your list, the Camaro was the hatchback. For a lot of people, the simple ergonomics of that car were not very good. Your opinion is that the Camaro was the better coupe and I won't argue that, but sales volumes said otherwise. It was the known problem within GM that the performance versions of the Fbody sold decent right up to the last few years. But the base car pretty much left you wanting and sales told that story. And as they say, the rest is history. It might even be the reason GM is against bringing hatchbacks to our market.