View Single Post
Old 05-08-2009, 11:33 PM   #27
GatorBlue371

 
GatorBlue371's Avatar
 
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323 View Post
it is a team game but look at the heat without just wade.....15 wins....and with wade 44 wins....you take away bron from the cavs they still make the playoffs ...same goes for bryant and the lakers. did you not see the jordanesque game wade portrayed in the 06 finals? that was all mainly him and of course he actually had a decent supporting cast.....kapono(who took the money and ran just like rafer austin) james posey( hops from one potential championship team to another aka robert horry) and of course shaq who is what the heat need now A CENTER....o and we had a veteran point guard instead of a rookie starting point guard. all i know is bron better win the championship this year...especially with a kevin garnetless celts....just like he did last year he had a inured pistons roster to get through to get to the finals...cakewalk...wade had the chapionship pistons team...looks like cavs are getting a crap defending champs roster again. either way i give props to him and i hope he destroys the hawks so they see what happens when you face a team of veterans with a superstar like wade. not the inexperienced team we had this year(heat)


Believe it or not, Wade (in my opinion) is the most complete player out of Wade/Lebron/Kobe. However, he is not the BEST basketball player, and is the least gifted of the group.


The Game of basketball is a team game, No ONE player can dominate and carry a team by himself. Not Michael Jordan, Not Lebron, Not Wade, No one. Great example... Wilt Chamberlain. The guy put up 100 pts in one game. The guy WAS the team, the fact that other members of that team are remembered is just because he made them that good. The guy was the best big man to ever play the game... BUT. Bill Russel and the Celtics got all the rings because they were the better team. For you to hold the 'no rings' against Lebron is not a valid argument. Besides... Hes only 23.

I could go on and print out a page full of things that Lebron has done by age 23 that MJ had not yet done. And that includes win MVP of the league. However im not here to argue he is better than MJ, im just saying he has the potential to be that good and he deserves the hype.

You know what happens to players who receive but dont deserve the hype? Ask Sebastian Telflair. They immediately fade away, the country moves on to the 'next big thing'. But Lebron is different, he has established himself as one of the best athletes in the world. The best player in the best basketball league in the world, by 23 years old.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
GatorBlue371 is offline   Reply With Quote