Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye
This is actually a pretty good article I just found. As I read it -- it took no stance on the subject...rare in modern journalism. It also mentions a few times how under no conditions is GM to become "government motors".
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/03/bu...l?ref=business |
Uh, Dragon, that article pretty much put it clear as day that GM would essentially be controlled by the President. There hasn't been such a direct media statement of that fact since
The Economist called GM Government Motors in the first place. That article in no way supports your argument that GM isn't nationalized an a waiting tool for the left-wing, environmental-wacko agenda.