[GT5Junkie]

Originally Posted by JusticePete

What I see is your desperation to prove to yourself what you want to believe while you ignore the hard data an independent source developed running the range of Mustangs, on the same track, on the same day with the same driver.

I'm not ignoring it at all. In fact, that hard data is CENTRAL to my point. The GT500 was faster then. The GT500 is improving even more. Yet you say it won't be any faster. So you're saying Ford spent all this money and the car isn't going to be any faster? That makes no sense. Are you really that much smarter than everyone at Ford? I kinda doubt it.

Every time I talk SOLELY about the Mustangs, you run away from the reality of the data and hide behind a Mustang vs Camaro article. Nothing that a Camaro does or doesn't do changes the Mustang Data. It doesn't matter how loud you type or how often you type it. What I also see is your need to be here on a Camaro forum to puff your chest, to bluster and scream my dad can beat up your dad.

What I see you is you completely ignoring the facts. Why don't you actually respond to my points instead of making personal attacks?

Will the GT500 have superior tires to the BOSS LS -- Nope, no R compound tires.

Did the 2012 GT500 have superior tires when it beat it in the test you keep talking about? Nope.

No increase in tire contact patch. Not to worry, GT5Junkie sprinkled Magic Mustang Traction Dust on the yet to be built with no data available from any track 2013 GT500 and it will hold in the turn 50 MPH faster.

Did the GT500 have an increase in contact patch when it beat it in the test you keep talking about? Nope.

The BOSS LS uses a well engineered brace with a rear seat delete to triangulate the monocoque to improve suspension function. Not to worry, GT5Junkie sprinkled Magic Mustang Monocoque Dust on the yet to be built no data available from any track 2013 GT500 and it is as solid as titanium brick.

Did the GT500 have a well engineered brace when it beat the Boss in the test you keep talking about? Nope.

The harder you corner in a three link suspension the greater the lift on the inside rear wheel which limits traction and ability to apply power coming out of a turn. GT5Junkie sprinkled Magic Mustang Anti-Matter Dust to suspend the laws of motion and physics on the yet to be built no data available from any track time 2013 GT500 so no matter how fast you corner the inside rear wheel will not lift.

The 2013 GT500 doesn't need to suspend the laws of physics to beat the 2012 GT500. Your "argument" is ridiculous, and is what is called a "straw man" argument.

Does the 2013 GT500 have better brakes? Yes.
More aggressive suspension? Yes.
Better acceleration? Yes.
More downforce? Yes.

You take all those yesses, and then say "no, it won't be any faster than a 2012".

Again, does that argument make any sense at all?

The 2013 has better brakes and better acceleration. That ALONE will make it faster than the 2012.

If the suspension revisions that they ALSO made won't result in superior handling/cornering, then why did they make them? Your arguments literally make no sense whatsoever.