Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3
There's so much camo that the bodywork could be almost anything under there. No way can that rendering be called 'accurate' without seeing the actual bodywork. The only bits that we can say are similar are the basic profile (which hasn't really changed in about 30 years) and the exhaust (which was a good guess based on the Centenial/Stingray concept from a couple
|
Wow, no offense, but you are blind. Look back at the Jalopnik article. There is a superimposed image of both. I have no doubts Jalopnik was given unauthorized pictures (as they have stated) of the C7 and made a rendition of said images. Auto manufactures rarely, rarely, one more time rarely change designs this close to production.
The point is, if you wanna know what the C7 will look like, the Jalopnik version is probably 99% accurate. (they choose to render the ZR1 version instead of the base model)
Maybe somebody remembers the photos Popular Science (Mechanics?)had of the GMT800 tahoes and avalanches (2007+) without camo, from an article from 2003 or so. Identical to what was produced.