View Single Post
Old 01-04-2012, 08:46 PM   #6
IOMZL1

 
IOMZL1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Z/28 | 2017 Viper ACR Extreme
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Brownsburg
Posts: 1,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by eolson View Post
Well, with that logic, they could just put more weight in back and the car would have 50%/50% weight distribution and weigh the same as the ZL1. Obviously many world class cars have the same or a tiny bit more of a front / rear proportion as the 2013 GT500. It's all in the engineering of the chassis and suspension. Erik
It is a fact that FWD weight bias creates understeer and he basically said that was the reason for not changing the tires. They went another route - many ways to skin a cat. True, the ZL1 is heavier. Each has their own strengths and weaknesses.

I'm not sure how many world class cars have more FWD weight balance than the GT500. All I'm saying is that he seemed to indicate a larger front tire was a bad thing when in fact it isn't that simple. As you say, it is all in the engineering which is my point. He just wanted to make GM's way of doing things look unrefined when that may not be the case. You don’t see F1 cars with skinny front tires regardless of their near ideal weight distribution.
__________________


dougshelbyengineering.com

www.facebook.com/dougshelbyengineering

www.instagram.com/dougshelbyengineering
IOMZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote