Quote:
Originally Posted by Havok
Or that there are like 11 games compared to like 30. BCS kind of makes it fair. Take for instance Utah, who plays in the Pac10/12, compared to an LSU team that plays in the SEC. SEC has way better schools in terms of football than the Pac10/12 does, so the SEC schools can lose 1 game to a opponent and there goes their hopes for a BCS championship. Teams like Utah have an easier time of going undefeated and therefore they look better than they are. BCS looks like strength of schedule as one of its components in rankings. Its one of the reasons why I think Boise still shouldn't be playing for the BCS when they did those undefeated seasons. Sure they were good, but their opponents were also terrible.
|
i think they should still find some way to use the BCS rankings, coaches, and AP, except at the end of the season break the games into a tournament rather 40,000 bowl games. I agree that MOST mid-majors should never play for a championship (i.e. Hawaii, Boise, TCU, Houston) so why not feed them to the big dogs in the first round if they have a legitimate argument and get them out of there? The season already goes til January, so why not just make games that more people will be interested in rather than the
WD-40 Tri-County Banana Bowl sponsored by Sharpie