Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboTA
You don't understand the law first of all. All Joe Pa had to do was walk in to the closest Pa State Police Barracks (which the PSP said he should have done) and reported what his GA told him that he witnessed. The PSP would then contact and interview the GA and if the GA told the same story that he told his father, Sandusky would have been questioned immediately. Ask me how I know all this. It could have ended right there. The PSP is very vocal of what Joe didn't do.
|
Please refrain from telling me what I don't know about as clearly I do. You can't read is the problem. I never said Joe couldn't I said "as far as the court of law goes, Joe's accounts of what happen would not be allowed in court if he was to testify because its hersey". So again like you said the PSP would contact the GA for his account of events not Joe and Joe's wouldn't matter as its a second hand account, they would have to go off what the witness told them not what Joe said the witness said and thats required before they even start to look into the matter. Which still can all be for not if the boy isn't willing to talk and at that age I doubt he would.