Quote:
Originally Posted by djsnoflake
Lots of valid points in the posts, actually.
|
I would have to say I concur with their comments about some of the moderators here. Although in their defense, as of late, they seem like they've been a little less intrusive.
but, I LOL'd when I saw this post:
Quote:
I do think it is funny that those mulleted buffoons are actually desperately stooping to the point of using the Mustang's refreshed rear as a valid complaint against what kind of car the 2011 Mustang is, nevermind that the the 2011 outclasses the Camaro in every way. If you want to get into aesthetics, have they actually looked at their own car? I honestly think the Camaro is just terrible looking any way you look at it, just a mix-mash of ugly lines and angles that don't look good from any perspective. Those weird, half-circular quad tail-lights look especially bad. Let's not even get into the bunker-like interior that looks like it was designed by a 16 year-old boy-racer.
Of course, the moral of the story is that aesthetics are subjective and aren't valid arguments against how good a car is. The 5.0 simply highlights what a joke the Camaro is and the auto press recognizes this. Hopefully GM will be able to salvage their little jalopy in the upcoming model years for the good of us consumers. Competition, real or imagined, is never bad.
|
Mulleted buffoon? Really? lol.