Quote:
Originally Posted by 19K3SS
Hey how about this, don't try to talk down to me like I'm an idiot. I partly agreed with you, yet saying one would be more likely to hit that kid going 145mph in a residential zone than if he was doing the speed limit of 25mph. So there should be speed limits. You then, agreed saying 145mph zones would be neat, but not in residential areas. So you agree that there should be speed limits in areas such as that?
And if I read the poll correctly, you created the poll, and therefore the options are 1- No speed limits, 2- anyone deemed qualified and "not a moron" can disobey any posted speed limit, 3- "i like to drive slow" because some of us feel that a highway setting is feasible whereas we feel no matter how qualified you were 6mo-1yr ago to get your license, there should be some limit when in a residential zone.
There'd be more possibility of people being able to agree with you, if the options were a bit better worded, and then explained properly.
|
o and since people are more likely to hit people going 145 than 25 or going 26 than 25 and that is unnacceptable... how bout this. PPl are more likely to hit a child if they are driving 25 than if they are driving..... drumroll...... 0mph.
SO by your logic since its unsafe to drive 25 we need to make the new speed limit 0mph.. THats right no foward or backward velocity in cars... We'd all be way safer... Far less people would die in terrible accidents...