View Single Post
Old 09-01-2011, 08:31 PM   #164
NoSyT
It's a Three Six, Vee Six
 
NoSyT's Avatar
 
Drives: '12 AGM 2LT/RS & '14 Silverado LTZ
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fort Leonard Wood, MO
Posts: 981
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Milner View Post
Texas won't lose any more players than they do now to in conference rivals like OU. Yes, I would put Vanderbilt over A&M. What's the Agg's record against SEC teams over the past few years? Do you watch much SEC football? It's a whole different animal. It didn't take balls to move, it took $$.
BTW....A stands for Agriculture and M stands for Machinery and I didn't have to look it up. A&M produces some of the best doctors of veterinary medicine in the country.
John, you and ponyman think alike. We'll just have to see what the recruiting classes look like over the next few years, huh? It's becoming a pointless arguement.

If you would put Vandy over A&M, where would Texas, OU, or Nebraska have finished in the SEC last year? Which brings a question....You a SEC or Texas fan? I'm not sure where you're coming from in all of this.

Actually, the "A&M" doesn't stand for anything specific since 1963. The "A&M" is a link to it's history before it became a University. TAMU was orginally called The Agricultural and Mechanical College of Texas until it transitioned from an all male college and military academy to a public civilian University and allowed women to attend in 1963.

You were sooooooo close but maybe you should have looked it up just to be sure.

I watch a lot SEC Football, best conference in the country, and a large part of my family is from Louisiana and are LSU fanatics. Since '06 TAMU has only played 4 games against the SEC...LSU, Arkansas (twice), and Georgia and they are 0-4 in those games...and that means what exactly next year?

The way I see it, TAMU played pretty good game against Arky and LSU with a brand new defense, a WR turned QB that started halfway through the season, and losing their leading rusher. They are better this year IMO.
NoSyT is offline   Reply With Quote