Quote:
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro
I don't know why you are so aggravated with the journalist. . . all he did was report quotes/statements from related parties or parties with experience in related areas. What does the journalist have to be held accountable for? Maybe you feel one can't fully take a side in the lawsuit without more information, but it's not like the journalist gave any opinion or assessments.
|
Agreed. Everyone here is going berserk about the details left off by the reporter. Granted, we know that most media is completely distorted these days and we should not trust much of what they opine when they start throwing in adjectives like "Radical" and "Controversial" when they talk about certain things. They lie often through omission or commission, so take some things with a grain of salt.
That being said, the offending point of the article is not if there was a serious defect or not or what the defect even is. Who cares? That's not the sticking point. The problem is that GM said "Oh that is not OUR problem. You need to sue the OLD company!"
Their slimy excuse for not doing the repairs is what people are taking issue with.
I think I would have been more satisfied if they had simply said "This problem is not serious and not life threatening. We do not feel we are obligated to fix this minor issue."
Instead we get a weasle words response. "Old GM's fault!!!'
THAT is why people are upset.