View Single Post
Old 03-24-2009, 11:49 AM   #170
GatorBlue371

 
GatorBlue371's Avatar
 
Drives: vrooooom vrooooom
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by fdjizm View Post
notice how those crappy drivers only managed to pull a 13.4 out of 400hp car... while a bolt on GT runs high 12's all day.

wouldnt take that review too seriously you will be really dissapointed you know as well as i do what a 400hp car can do and u know they obviously didnt drive that car.. but if u want to bring in numbers.. we can play that game too check these out...

Mustang Skid pad 0.91g
Camaro Skid pad 0.88g

Mustang Slalom 68.4mph
Camaro Slalom 68.6mph

Mustang 60-0 107ft
Camaro 60-0 109ft

Mustang 0.60 4.9
Camaro 0-60 4.7
So the Camaro is faster, more comfortable, better looking, more livable and more modern.


Wanna put money on who the Comparison winner will be?







Believe it or not I like you Mustang guys here, out of my close circle of friends 3 have Mustangs. Actually, buddy of mine just found out he wouldnt be able to get an SS so i talked him into getting a Bullitt. (his budget was up to 22k, so its Bullitt all day long) Ive really got nothing personal against the Mustang and I sure as shit am not a Camaro fan boy. If anything I am more into the cars i actually own which include none of the above.
__________________
"With a light touch on the brakes, run the revs up a bit. Slip off the brake and bury the throttle. There's a light chirp as tires scratch for bite. Then comes a sub-5.0-second sled ride to 60 mph. A tick over 13.0 sec. and you're through the quarter-mile. It's a rush, of course, but not overly dramatic. Try the same thing with this pair's predecessors of 1970 or so and you'll find yourself in a bit of a wrestling match. Ain't progress wonderful? Maybe yes, and maybe sometimes it's fun to wrestle."
GatorBlue371 is offline   Reply With Quote