Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Blur
Let's not forget the big motivator that buyers always worry will hurt them the most: price. With people thinking about money, even those who are getting new cars now are more careful than usual. Ford's decision to redesign, even if lazily, a car to look only slightly different is costly. Let's add that the new motor will cost money, and that a nicer interior, if ever implemented, will add to cost. For the money, the Camaro is the clearly better deal as no one can dispute that GM invested its very soul into the Camaro. In the end, someone has to pay for the new engine, better interior, and more advanced components. If you have a Mustang that costs only a little less than the Camaro with cheap parts, comparatively poor performance, and an inferior suspension, price will no longer be in Ford's favor.
|
what is with you guys and these "cheap parts" "plastic interior made by a 12yr old boy" "inferior suspension" (that handles fine by the way) these comments are so ignorant its ridiculous. denial is way too heavey around these here parts, i give credit where credit is due but u guys are just nuts with these comments as if the mustang was literally made oout of cardboard or something.
fanboyism is way to high here, read the memo!! not every other car but yours is made out of paper mache. you guys talk about how old an SRA is but u dont say anything about your 20yr old pushrod engines? lets get realistic here and put some thought into your posts instead of blindingly making crazy comments that make sense 40% of the time.