View Single Post
Old 08-01-2011, 01:49 AM   #58
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
The automakers all seem to be in favor of this new rule...I assume because it's apparently a bit 'smarter' in the designation between trucks and cars...and even credits gas-saving technologies like EV or ethanol...

I think, though, they're mostly in favor of it because it's a clearly-defined "do this". Versus a dozen competing standards that need to be decoded.

I hate it. I think it's completely stupid, frankly...in every way. But if the automakers have a hand in writing it, maybe it won't be as awful as it could be. Wishful thinking, perhaps...
Its my understanding that this was reached as a compromise. Some groups were pushing for 62 mpg, so the automakers are 'happy' with 54.5 mpg, since it could have been worse. Sorta like going to court and being 'happy' you were sentenced to 'only' 5 years instead of 6 ...
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote