View Single Post
Old 07-26-2011, 12:04 PM   #20
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBM View Post
You're forgetting that half the cars you listed are much larger than the 500

Some yes, but not all. the Fiesta, Cooper, Fit, etc, etc, are basically direct competitors and it is not doing that bad.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
2012 Cruze does 38 MPG. 39 MPG with ECO auto, 42 with ECO manual. Sonic will easily do 40.

Hell, the 2013 Malibu ECO does 38 MPG.

And fueleconomy.gov says the thing runs on PREMIUM?
True, but look at the tech the Cruze is using, and if the automatic works as tragically as the current one, no thanks. I would like to see how they are getting the extra MPG from the Cruze seeing as it already basically refuses to downshift and i don't see how it could upshift to topgear any quicker. Keep in mind, the 500 is more a fashion statement type thing than an all out economy car, even though most Americans will see it this way. As for the Eco models, remember too, they are running tons of aerodynamic enhancements and even changes to the ratios to ech particular gear in the transmission. if they went that route they could probably get well over 40 on the highway from 500. Also, what is the City MPG on the Cruze and Malibu Ecos, I would easily bet the combined MPG for the 500 is still higher than those.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote