Quote:
Originally Posted by Havok
The whole trial comes down to "Prove to me with factual evidence that a murder has taken place". Exactly you can't because all that was found was bones. If you can't prove there was even a murder then you can't prove 3 of the 7 charges (the ones she was found guilty). Some people in this thread would make some crappy jurors since they can't seem to separate their personal feelings from the evidence that was presented.
Finding chloroform on the computer doesn't mean there was a murder
Her laughing at the trial doesn't mean she committed a murder
Her not reporting a child missing does not mean there was a murder
Prove to me beyond a reasonable doubt that there was a murder rather than the kid jumping in the water and dying. You can't therefore case close not guilty of murder. Remember innocent until proven guilty. Turn off Nancy Grace.
If the police did their damn job the first time around then the verdict would have been different so don't blame the jury or anyone else blame the police that were told of her body twice before they finally went down on the third time.
|
Thank you Havok. Well said. I think this would've gone down differently if the cops in the area didn't just brush it off when a utility worker calls and says "Hey. i think I've found a body. come take a look".