Quote:
Originally Posted by Future MDPilot
Still doesn't mean she killed her.
DNA test negative on the duct tape.
Internet search apparently equates to action. I just watched a FPSRussia video, now I'm going to go out shooting a M240 randomly.
No DNA match in the car.
No DNA match in or around the body.
The law is based on evidence not heersay. All of your points are emotionally involved. Courts and jurors seldom care for that information if evidence is negligible.
Jose Baez is a nobody. He is not high profile, and as a matter of fact was no where near high profile until today. In the OJ case, once again, there was DNA OF HIS WIFE ALL OVER HIS BODY AND APARTMENT IN THE FORM OF BLOOD. In Casey Anthony's case, THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE. This jury made the right decision. What if Casey was in fact innocent and the parent's are just creating a scheme? You have to keep an open mind and look at both sides of the spectrum. Casey obviously wanted to live the "Beautiful Life", and the daughter's death may have been a convenience to her and wanted to keep it that way. Is it sick? Yes. Is it worth a guilty verdict on being an imbecile? No.
Also, did I say that Casey was innocent? No. Did I say that she was guilty? No. I do not have enough knowledge or time to care for this case, I just enjoy intelligent discussion.
|
+1 I agree with what u said, and not all you see or hear in the media was said in front of the jury. I think she had something to do with the death. But the holes that Baez had brought forth it was hard for a jury to bring a guilty verdict and send someone to death or life. People are way to emotional and don't know how the justice system works. Just go watch a trial or two and how things really work, people would be amazed. I called the same verdict a couple days ago with some people I know and they all said they would convict.