Quote:
Originally Posted by Murph0408
Mayweather is an all-time great. If you ask me he was even before Pac became relevant. Honestly he could've just hung'm up after his DeLaHoya fight and that was that. Him beating Hatton, Marquez, Mosley was just icing on the cake at that point.
no need for him to beat pac to prove anything. there will always be someone else out there for him to face and people to say "oh he retired before he could face [insert name], he's ducking him."
mayweather >>>> pac, everyone knows it, nobody wants to admit it because mayweather has attitude while pacman acts like a saint (despite his rumored PED use)
|
Hmmm... I think no. In fact, Mayweather is essentially a smaller version of Roy Jones Jr. Great talent, but never has the balls to take on the best. Sure, plenty of fights against good fighters, plenty of fights against guys with 15-0, 18-0 records....but mostly guys who have never been tested against quality opponents.
Still, I'd take Pac Man in a fight against Mayweather simply because I don't think Mayweather can beat him. He struggled to put away De La Hoya and Mosley.....and both of those guys couldn't touch Pac Man.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nards444
Mayweather. Resume is a lot better
|
That's hilarious...
Pac Man has more fights, more championships in different divisions (8 vs. 5) and Pac Man has almost as many KO's as Mayweather has total fights (38 vs. 41).
They've fought pretty much the same people for the last 5 years.... and Pac Man has beaten those people worse than Mayweather did...
De La Hoya - Pac Man TKO'd him in the 8th rd
Hatton - Pac Man TKO'd him in the 2nd rd...
I don't even have to go on because the list of fighters favors Pac Man.... and that's not even my opinion...